|
|
|
|
ROBERT WILLIAMS BUCHANAN (1841 - 1901)
|
|
|
|
THEATRE REVIEWS
38. The Trumpet Call (1891) - continued
Punch (22 August, 1891 - Vol. 101, p.89)
QUITE A LITTLE NOVELTY.
DEAR MR. PUNCH,—As Englishmen are so often accused of want of originality, I hope you will let me call your attention to an occasion when it was conclusively proved that at least two of the British race were free from the reproach. The date to which I refer was the 1st of August last, when “a new and original drama,” entitled The Trumpet Call, was produced at the Royal Adelphi Theatre, and the two exceptions to the general rule then proclaimed were Messrs. GEORGE R. SIMS and ROBERT BUCHANAN, its authors. The plot of this truly new and original piece is simple in the extreme. Cuthbertson, a young gentleman, has married his wife in the belief that his Wife No. 1 (of whom he has lost sight), is dead. Having thus ceased to be a widower, Cuthbertson is confronted by Wife No. 1 and deserts Wife No. 2. Assured by the villain of the piece that she is not really married to Cuthbertson, Wife No. 2 prepares to marry her informant. The nuptials are about to be celebrated in the Chapel Royal, Savoy, when enter Wife No. 1 who explains that she was a married woman when she met Cuthbertson, and therefore, a fair, or rather unfair, bigamist. Upon this Cuthbertson (who is conveniently near in a pew, wearing the unpretentious uniform of the Royal Horse Artillery), rushes into the arms of the lady who has erroneously been numbered Wife No. 2, when she has been in reality Wife No. 1, and all is joy. Now I need scarcely point out to you that nothing like this has ever been seen on the stage before. It is a marvel to me how Messrs. SIMS and BUCHANAN came to think of such clever things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professor Ginnifer exhibiting Sims’ and Buchanan’s Monstrosities.
But if it had been only the plot that was original, I should not have been so anxious to direct attention to The Trumpet Call. But the incidents and characters are equally novel. For instance, unlike The Lights o’ London, there is a caravan and a showman. Next, unlike In the Ranks, there are scenes of barrack-life that are full of freshness and originality. In Harbour Lights, if my memory does not play me false, the hero enlisted in the Guards, in The Trumpet Call he joins the Royal Horse Artillery. Then, again, unlike the scene in the New Cut in The Lights o’ London, there is a view by night of the exterior of the Mogul Music Hall. Further, there is a “Doss House” scene, that did not for a moment (or certainly not for more than a moment) recall to my mind that gathering of the poor in the dark arches of a London bridge, in one of BOUCICAULT’s pieces. By the way, was that play, After Dark, or was it The Streets of London? I really forget which. Then, all the characters in the new play are absolutely new and original. The hero who will bear everything for his alleged wife’s sake, and weeps over his child, is quite new. So is the heroine who takes up her residence with poor but amusing showmen, instead of wealthy relatives. That is also quite new, and there was nothing like it in The Lights o’ London. The villain, too, who will do and dare anything (in reason) to wed the lady who has secured his affections, is also a novelty. So is a character played by Miss CLARA JECKS as only Miss CLARA JECKS can and does play it. And there are many more equally bright and fresh, and, in a word, original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An Altared Scene.
So, my dear Mr. Punch, hasten to the Royal Adelphi Theatre, if you wish to see something that will either wake you up or send you to sleep. Go, my dear Mr. Punch, and sit out The Trumpet Call, and when you have seen it, you will understand why I sign myself,
Yours faithfully, ONE WHO HAS SEEN NOTHING LIKE IT BEFORE.
___
The Illustrated London News (22 August, 1891 - p.27)
THE PLAYHOUSES.
BY CLEMENT SCOTT.
Let me take the opportunity of a dull and uneventful week to say a few words more about this “convention” that is supposed by many earnest writers to be strangling the stage, to hint, as it were, something of the new drama that is foreshadowed, and at the same time to answer—and, I hope, correct—many of the courteous critics and correspondents who have taken exception to my remarks and in a measure quite misunderstood them. My contention from the first has been that the drama generally, whether it be in its form, its literature, its tone and its tendency, has improved enormously within the last quarter of a century, and is improving every hour we live. My second point was—and I have never at any time swerved from it—that those are false guides and counsellors who insist that young dramatists should scorn “convention,” as it is called, and neglect the dogmatic truths which from all times have governed this branch of art. I say, then, that the drama as a whole is improving day by day and hour by hour. Melodrama is selected by the thoughtless as the branch of dramatic art that is most open to exception, and melodrama is always quoted as the form of drama that is most obstinately conservative. But is it so? I consider—and surely in these discussions practical experience should have some weight—that melodrama under George Sims, Henry Pettitt, Robert Buchanan, and many others, is, relatively, as much an improvement on the melodrama of Buckstone, Boucicault, and Byron as is the comedy and life-plays of Pinero, Jones, Henley, Stevenson, Malcolm Watson, Jerome, and many of the writers of the younger school an improvement on the dramatic reform started in the renaissance period of Robertson. Indeed, I think the despised melodrama, again relatively, has advanced more than any other branch of dramatic art. It is less stilted, less stagey, less obstinately conservative, less absurdly conventional, and far more natural than it was ten or twenty years ago. But it is idle to maintain, as some seem inclined to maintain, that this improvement dates from to-day, that it is due in any way to the influence of Ibsen, or that it has been caused by any present-day revolt of the younger school of critics against the old. The outward and visible sign of melodrama’s recantation and advance dates not from to-day but from the days of Mr. Wilson Barrett’s management of the Princess’s Theatre. I maintain that Mr. Wilson Barrett did for melodrama what Robertson did for domestic comedy, and what Henry Irving has done for the Shaksperean and romantic drama. The first sign of melodramatic renaissance was when Mr. Wilson Barrett brought Mr. George R. Sims to the front, when he produced “The Lights o’ London,” and when he followed it up with “The Silver King.” Don’t let anyone be so deluded as to suppose that melodrama’s advance dates from “The Trumpet Call,” for it is not true. Melodrama’s advance dates from the time when George R. Sims broke through the hedge and showed that time and the hour required a more natural, a more personal dramatist than Dion Boucicault, who leaned more to romance than reality. If Robertson was the pioneer of personal comedy, then Sims was the pioneer of personal and local melodrama. The drama’s patrons had shown what laws they wanted, and George Sims understood them; and yet, forsooth, there is no playwright more systematically abused by the new school of faddists than the very man who created the reform for which they are all shrieking. There is one element in the matter that is always forgotten, and that is the acting. How far has more natural acting been the cause of the palpable improvement in mere melodrama? Far more than the critics are inclined to allow. They go and see “The Trumpet Call” which happens to be singularly well acted—acted, that is to say, in a manner as natural as melodrama will allow—and with strange inconsistency some of them vote the drama strong and the acting tame. They see that something is different; they do not know what it is, and they hurry to the conclusion that Mr. Sims and Mr. Buchanan are wise to yield to the clamour which would make our drama undramatic and our plays colourless. But they say no word for the natural art of Mr. Leonard Boyne, of Mrs. Patrick Campbell, and, more than all, of Miss Elizabeth Robins, whose natural style, whose superb scorn of melodramatic rant, whose hatred of the affectations of the old melodramatic style cause just the difference which is wrongly ascribed to a “new departure in melodrama.” Rubbish! The “new departure” in natural and local drama began at the princess’s Theatre. The new departure in melodramatic acting dates from “The Trumpet Call” at the Adelphi, though it is obstinate and unjust to forget both Mr. Wilson Barrett and Mr. E. S. Willard at the Princess’s. And now one word about the dramatic dogma on which I insist and for which I am gravely taken to task. I am told by clever writers that music is the only art that has a dogma. That is the only mechanical art—the only art, rather, that has any obstinate mechanism in it. I am told that I say no word about painting, and it is insisted that literature is as free as the winds, and that dogma knows it not. But is it so? What would become of the painter who could not draw or who had no sense of colour? Is not the rule of drawing a straight line—dogma? Is not the truth of the rules of colour and perspective a dogma? Does the painter require no drawing-master? Again, with the poet. What would become of the poet who had no ear, who neglected the laws of scansion and rhyme and rhythm and metre? Is there no dogma in poetry? Is the novelist permitted to say what he has to say without any divisions of chapters, without any arbitrary form whatever? Where is the artist in any branch of art who is not bound by dogma? Literature is, of course, as free as the winds, and long may it remain so!—but I do not envy the literary man who embarks on his career and disregards form or style. And so is the drama as free as air; but the drama is governed by rules as absolute as any other branch of art. My contention is that this protest against “convention” really means a protest against the workmanlike and well-made play. If, indeed, “The Trumpet Call” is a well-made play, then I have nothing more to say. For my own part, I do not find it nearly so well-made a play as many that have preceded it. I believe it to be deficient in colour and contrast, not so vividly dramatic as its predecessors; but its inherent defects have been concealed by the strong and vivid manner of the authors, by the force of its episodes, by the strength of its scenic illusion, and, more than all, by the intensely natural style adopted by the majority of the performers. It really almost makes one laugh to be told that the natural school of acting, that the protest against conventionality, that the war against the stereotyped and stagey dates from to-day, when many of us have been fighting for them tooth and nail, vi et armis, ever since 1860. Let us be natural, by all means; let literature and dramatists and actors have free play; let these clever people who talk so much and perform so little invent for us a new set of passions to play upon, but do not let them try to persuade the young dramatist that he can do without dogma, or the young dramatist will assuredly come to untimely grief.
___
The Theatre (1 September, 1891)
“THE TRUMPET CALL.”
Original drama, in four acts, by GEORGE R. SIMS and ROBERT BUCHANAN. First produced at the Adelphi Theatre, Saturday, August 1st, 1891.
|
|
|
|
William Makepeace Thackeray wrote a novel without a hero. Messrs. Sims and Buchanan have actually written a melodrama without a villain, and this for the Adelphi; and yet I am not at all prepared to say that their new departure will not prove as successful as they can wish. For they have contrived to give just that suspicion of baseness to one of their characters (Featherston) that keeps the audience on the alert to watch whether he will not develop something villainous; and then Bertha is a very wicked and vengeful woman indeed. Perhaps the “refined” melodrama that we have had to the Haymarket and St. James’s has had its influence on the authors, and this is a tentative work to see whether the Adelphi audiences will be satisfied with the loss of contrast between almost sublimated virtue and the obtrusive defiant villainy. Whatever may be the ultimate verdict on the play, its reception on the first night was most flattering. The fortunes of the hero and heroine turn on a supposed bigamous marriage. Cuthbertson elopes with Constance Barton, and after a year or so she returns to obtain her father’s forgiveness. This he refuses unless she will leave her husband. She clings to the latter, but on the very evening Cuthbertson recognises in a vagabond clairvoyante, known as Astræa, the Bertha whom he has married years before, who had deserted him, and whom he supposed to be dead. The poor fellow, to free Constance, enlists under another name in the Horse Artillery, previously confiding his history to Featherston, and as nothing is heard of him for six years, Featherston, who has been a rejected suitor of Constance’s, makes fresh advances to her. Presently Cuthbertson returns covered with glory, having fought in a Burmese campaign, and saved his colonel’s life. He is being decorated on parade, when Constance fancies she recognises him, but to her questions he absolutely denies that he is other than John Lanyon, the name he assumed on enlisting. A moody, reckless companion of his, James Redruth, has confessed to him that his life has been ruined by a woman, whom he swears he will kill whenever he meets. Redruth is put in the guard-room for some breach of discipline. He escapes and takes refuge in a “Doss House in the Mint,” where he meets with Astræa, who proves to be the wife who had wronged him. He stabs, and would kill her outright, but is prevented by Cuthbertson, who recognises in her the woman who has been the cause of all his misery. Redruth is taken prisoner, and we are led to understand commits suicide. In the last act Featherston has persuaded Constance to accept him, and they are at the altar, when Astræa stays the marriage service by confessing that she was already a wife when Cuthbertson married her, and points to him among the spectators as Constance’s lawful husband. It will be said that portions of this play are reminiscent of “In the Ranks” and “Lights o’ London,” but the incidents are quite differently treated, and if there is only one strong “sensation,” the interest is steadily maintained throughout. It would be too great a wrench from old associations if there were not plenty of the comic element at the Adelphi, and this we are supplied with by Mr. Lionel Rignold, who is most amusing as Professor Ginnifer, a showman and a sort of “universal provider” of entertainments, by clever Mrs. Leigh, who is jealous of Ginnifer’s “bearded lady,” by clever, saucy Miss Clara Jecks, who as a “serio-comic” artist “winks the other eye,” and by Mr. R. H. Douglas, as the young trumpeter, Tom Dutton, who makes very comical love to her in excellent bits of low comedy. Mr. Leonard Boyne played the hero most impressively, the audience sympathising with him throughout, and in the scene where he cannot kiss his little child in the barrack yard, he was very moving. Mr. Boyne also deserves great praise for the generous manner in which he supported Miss Robins, whose intensity and earnestness were much to be admired; they were more really artistic than, though not quite so dramatic as, those of the usual Adelphi heroine. Hers is a part with but little relief of brightness; indeed this may be said of both hero and heroine; the exponents are therefore the more worthy of praise. Mrs. Patrick Campbell has an infinitely more showy character as the dissolute, mocking Astræa. She has conceived the character well, both as to make-up and execution, but the latter showed signs of the amateur. It was, however, a performance that promises to place Mrs. Campbell among our foremost actresses in the future. Mr. James East worked up the character of James Redruth; moody and reckless at first, he let you see that there was a good, brave fellow spoilt by his misfortune, too weak to combat his despair, who flew to drink to make him forget his troubles; and at the finish, when he met the woman who had destroyed almost all that was best in him, his mad passion and revenge were finely wrought out. Mr. Charles Dalton had a most thankless part, and yet he managed to make a great deal of it and to show how deep and constant his love was. Mr. J. D. Beveridge was the beau ideal of a gallant non-commissioned officer, as Sergeant-Major Milligan, cheery and genial; and good work was done by Messrs. W. and J. Northcote, Royston Keith, H. Cooper, and Miss Vizetelly. The scenery was of the best. The interior and exterior of the “Angler’s Delight,” “The Doss House,” and “The Interior of the Chapel Royal, Savoy” (with its choristers, etc.), reflected the greatest credit on the painters, Messrs. Bruce Smith and W. Hann, and on Mr. Frederick Glover, who produced the play.
___
The Referee (20 September, 1891 - p3)
The American rights of “The Trumpet Call,” Messrs. G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan’s highly successful Adelphi drama, have been acquired by Mr. Eugene Tompkins of the Boston Theatre, who intends to produce it on a very big scale. At the Adelphi they have the Royal Horse Artillery “real,” and they like the real thing in the States. If a British regiment should land on the shores of America shortly, let us hope there will not be a wild scare and a repetition of the Mitylene business. It will only be by a friendly battery of the Royal Horse Artillery on its way to Boston to appear in “The Trumpet Call.”
___
The Morning Post (26 November, 1891 - p.3)
ADELPHI THEATRE.—“The Trumpet Call,” by Messrs. G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, has reached its one hundredth night, and, probably, it will be played by the present admirable company for many nights to come. It has every quality likely to make an Adelphi drama attractive—an interesting and well developed story, effective situations, bright and humorous dialogue, and characters that awaken the sympathies of the audience.
___
The Graphic (5 December, 1891)
The Trumpet Call has passed triumphantly its hundredth representation. It has undergone a few changes in the cast without, however, impairing the efficiency of the representation. Miss Essex Dane’s Constance is especially deserving of notice. Messrs. Sims and Buchanan’s play seems still to give boundless delight to ADELPHI audiences.
___
The Referee (3 January, 1892 - p.3)
George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan are at Brighton, engaged on the melodrama which will be produced at the Adelphi at the end of the run of “The Trumpet Call,” which, judging by appearances, is still a long way off.
___
The Portsmouth Evening News (1 March, 1892 - p.2)
“THE TRUMPET CALL.” _____
One of the best Adelphi plays, and the very best that Messrs. George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan have turned out in concert, is a fair description of “The Trumpet Call,” the modern drama of military and domestic life that has now well nigh reached its 200th representation at the Adelphi Theatre. Ere it has run its full length in London an opportunity is being given to provincial playgoers of witnessing the popular piece, for Messrs. A. and S. Gatti have organised an able company that is now touring the principal towns in the country. Brighton was visited first and Portsmouth comes second, the company having started a week’s engagement at the Theatre Royal last night. There was a large and thoroughly interested house, which set the seal of its favour unmistakably upon the new production. Given a liking for a stirring play vividly depicted, the man who would find fault with “The Trumpet Call” as thus presented under the direction of so experienced a manager as Mr. George Davies must be, indeed, hard to please. While the hand of each collaborator if clearly recognised from time to time, there is nothing disjointed about the “book,” the clever plot being smoothly and naturally developed, and the Sims humour as well dovetailed with the Buchanan imagination as though the whole piece of work was the emanation of one mind. Then the military costumes and the elaborate scenery, with its mechanical effects, are admirable, as well they may be, seeing that they are a replica of those presented at the Adelphi. Each of the four acts has its effective “sets,” and the name of Bruce Smith, which constantly recurs in connection with them, is a guarantee of their artistic excellence. Particularly does the closing scene call for praise. It depicts the interior of the Chapel Royal, Savoy, where a wedding is in progress—a wedding that is destined never to be completed, for now is the tangled thread of trouble that the playwrights have busily woven for the chief characters quickly unravelled, and breaking hearts are made whole and happy again. Cuthbert Cuthbertson, years before this scene is reached, has married the daughter of Sir William Barton, in the belief that his former wife, Bertha, was dead. But the joy of his new married life, blessed by the presence of a dear little son, was broken in upon by the discovery that Bertha, who had proved a shameless, heartless woman, still lived. When they met again in mutual recognition, she consented to remain silent only on the terribly hard condition that he would leave his second wife and his child for ever. So, to save them from the disgrace that he had unwittingly brought upon them, he vanished, leaving only a fondly-cherished memory. How, as a soldier on the battlefield, he displayed such signal bravery as to entitle him to promotion and to honours, at the conferring of which his wife and child, who had long believed him dead, happened to become spectators; how, in pursuit of his resolve to spare them degradation, he denied to her his identity, while his heart was full of passionate yearning; and how he has even nerved himself to be present at her reluctant espousal of her cousin Richard Featherston is a complicated tale for the dramatists rather than the critic to tell. It looks, almost up to the last, as if dramatic justice is not going to be done; but the wretched Bertha staggers into the church nigh unto death, and confesses that the man who has murderously stabbed her in his revenge was her rightful husband, antecedent to Cuthbertson, so that the latter is really married to the bride now standing at the altar. The company is a decidedly strong one. In the trying part of Cuthbert Cuthbertson Mr. Harrington Reynolds played with emotional force, being at his best in the affecting scenes with his wife and child. As Constance, the loving, true-hearted wife, Miss Minnie Turner was refined and pathetic in her acting. Miss Mary Raby, as the outcast Bertha, well conveyed the idea of that reckless, abandoned woman. Mr. Arthur C. Percy admirably filled the role of Sergt.-Major Milligan, a generous-hearted Irishman and a good soldier. “Professor” Ginnifer, a vivacious showman, was gushingly depicted by Mr. Joe Bracewell, who kept the fun alive with the able assistance of Mr. Ralph Roberts as Tom Dutton, an amatory young trumpeter. Miss Ada Rogers made a charming Lavinia Ginnifer, the showman’s lively daughter; Mr. Henry W. Hatchman did well with the part of Richard Featherston, the bridegroom, who has the cup of happiness dashed from his lips at the very altar; Mr. Arthur Whitehead was sufficiently surly and vengeful as James Redruth, Bertha’s wronged husband; and little Miss Christine Bernard acted with pretty precocity the part of Little Cuthbert.
___
The Referee (13 March, 1892 - p.3)
That popular Adelphi drama, “The Trumpet Call,” is at present being played by no less than five companies—by Messrs. A. and S. Gatti’s company at the Adelphi, by Messrs. Gatti’s company in the provinces, by Mrs. Lane’s company at the Britannia, by Mr. Eugene Tompkins’s company in Boston, and by Mr. Bland Holt’s company is Australia.
___
The Era (19 March, 1892 - p.9)
THE BRITANNIA. On Monday, March 14th, the Drama, in Four Acts, by George R. Sims and R. Buchanan, entitled “THE TRUMPET CALL.”
Cuthbert Cuthbertson ... Mr ALGERNON SYMS Sergeant-Major Milligan ... Mr W. H. PERRETTE Professor Ginnifer ... Mr G. B. BIGWOOD Richard Featherstone ... Mr W. STEADMAN Tom Dutton ... ... Mr W. GARDINER Colonel Engleheart ... Mr J. MUNRO Sir William Barton ... ... Mr BRUCE LINDLEY Deputy of the Doss House ... Mr F. BEAUMONT Rev, Carr Clare ... ... Mr KINGSLEY Captain Sparks ... ... Mr ATHERTON Spriggins ... ... Mr LUCAS Plummy ... ... Mr GREGORY James Redruth ... ... Mr W. COPLEY Flash Bob ... ... Mr E. LEIGH Corporal Plummer ... ... Mr BARRETT Tompkins ... ... Mr JOHNSON Constance ... ... Miss BEATRICE TOY Bertha ... ... Miss OLIPH WEBB Mrs. Wicklow ... ... Miss M. GRIFFITHS Lill ... ... Miss KELSEY Lucy ... ... Miss WOODIN Little Cuthbert ... ... Little JOSEPHINE Lavinia Ginnifer ... ... Miss NELLIE STANLEY The Old Wife ... ... Miss M. A. PETTIFER
The attraction at the Britannia Theatre this week has been Messrs George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan’s excellent melodrama in four acts entitled The Trumpet Call, which has been running successfully at the Adelphi Theatre since the first of August last. The Britannia company have had to do their “level best” to replace the leading members of the fine cast which Messrs Gatti so liberally provided for the production of the play. Mr Leonard Boyne’s Cuthbert Cuthbertson, Mr J. D. Beveridge’s Serjeant-Major Milligan, Mr Lionel Rignold’s Professor Ginnifer, Mr Charles Dalton’s Richard Featherstone, Mr R. H. Douglass’s Dutton, Mr Arthur Leigh’s William Barton, Mr James East’s Redruth, and Mr Willie Drew’s Tompkins are not impersonations easily equalled, to say nothing of Miss Elizabeth Robins’s Constance, Mrs H. Leigh’s Mrs Wicklow, and Miss Clara Jecks’s Lavinia Ginnifer. That, in The Trumpet Call, there is no “villain of the piece,” might have been expected to lessen the favour with which the drama would have been received by audiences so faithful to the old traditions as those who patronise the Britannia; but, as a matter of fact, the enjoyment of the Hoxtonites who have visited Mrs Sara Lane’s house this week has not been diminished by this innovation, and the deeply interesting story, the stirring incidents, and the military feeling of Messrs Sims and Buchanan’s play have had full effect on crowded houses. Despite the industrial occupations of the majority of its inhabitants, there is evidently a keen martial instinct in the district, and the strong scene at Woolwich Barracks went remarkably well on Monday last. The audience followed the fortunes of Cuthbert Cuthbertson with deep attention; and the simple denouement of the play—the annulling of his marriage by “Astræa’s” confession of a previous union—appeared to afford as much satisfaction to those present as though a similar solution of a similar difficulty had never before been employed by playwright or applauded by popular audience. Certainly the acting of the very capable company under engagement had much to do with the cordial reception obtained by the piece. The production was particularly interesting, as several of the cast were recruits, and one or two of the old favourites were seen in characters which were a little out of their usual lines. For instance, Mr Steadman, generally associated with villainy of the most desperate kind, was admirably calm and reasonable as the patient and considerate Richard Featherstone. It was refreshing to find Mr Algernon Syms representing a personage not absolutely blameless, and as Cuthbert Cuthbertson he showed that his ability is not confined to one kind of rôle. Miss Nellie Stanley, whom we have often seen and praised in other places, made a very successful first appearance at the Britannia, and the smartness and piquancy of her Lavinia Ginnifer were quite deserving of the credit they undoubtedly obtained. Miss Oliph Webb’s Astræa was a really fine piece of melodramatic acting, her delivery of the longer speeches being especially powerful and effective. Mr G. B. Bigwood was highly humorous as Ginnifer, and especially distinguished himself by the manner in which he struggled with, and eventually tamed, a troublesome and refractory moustache. Miss Beatrice Toy was in “good form” on Monday in the part of Constance. We have seldom seen Miss Toy look better or act with more delicacy or truer feeling. Mr Perrette was admirably blunt and soldierly as the Serjeant, and Mr Bruce Lindley, though, perhaps, his make-up might have been a little improved upon, did justice to the stern energy of Sir William. Mr W. Gardiner’s low comedy as Tom Dutton was of the right sort, and Mr J. Munro had a part which suited his style in that of Colonel Engleheart. The remaining characters were all carefully and adequately sustained, and the effective scenery by Messrs W. C. and C. Douglass had a great deal to do with the triumphant success of The Trumpet Call, which was followed by B. Webster’s farce The Laughing Hyena.
___
The Daily Telegraph (23 March, 1892 - p.5)
ADELPHI THEATRE.
Neither changeable weather, nor depressing times, nor the deadlock in the theatrical world or other quarters, seem to make any impression on “The Trumpet Call,” which was cheerily sounded last night for the 200th time at the popular theatre so admirably managed by the Brothers Gatti. The success is no doubt due in the first place to a good, wholesome, and amusing story, capitally told by those past masters in their art, George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan; and, secondly, to the acting, which is as good as the play. The picturesque rendering of the hero, Cuthbert Cuthbertson, by Mr. Leonard Boyne, who moves all hearts in the scene where the brave young soldier for the best of purposes denies himself to his wife and child; the weird and intense dramatic force of Mrs. Patrick Campbell as the revengeful, dissolute gipsy woman; the pretty simplicity of Miss Evelyn Millard as the ill-starred heroine, and the rare Cockney humour of Mr. Lionel Rignold as the Professor are as much appreciated as ever. With reference to a recent discussion on the warming and ventilating of theatres, it should not be forgotten that by an ingenious arrangement the Messrs. Gatti have succeeded in conquering a very puzzling difficulty. The Adelphi is not only the best-lighted theatre in London, but it is chill-proof and draught-free. This is a value not to be despised in a long winter and a laggard spring.
___
The Morning Post (24 March, 1892 - p.5)
ADELPHI THEATRE. _____
“The Trumpet Call,” by Messrs. G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, has proved one of the most successful of modern dramas, and the run of two hundred nights which it has already achieved by no means indicates its approaching termination. On the contrary, large audiences are still attracted to admire and applaud the manner in which the Messrs. Gatti have placed the drama upon the stage and to follow with the deepest interest the fortunes of the hero, so admirably played by Mr. Leonard Boyne, who in the pathetic scene in which the young soldier denies all knowledge of his wife and child acts with such sympathetic effect. With Mr. Lionel Rignold as the humorous Professor, Mrs. Patrick Campbell as the vagrant wife, Miss Evelyn Millard as the gentle heroine, and most efficient acting in all the characters, “The Trumpet Call” is presented in a manner to justify the cordial recognition nightly given to the play and the performers.
___
The Era (26 March, 1892 - p.10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Morning Post (19 April, 1892 - p.2)
ADELPHI.
“The Trumpet Call,” by Messrs. G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, once more drew a large audience to the Adelphi, where the drama will be played for a few nights more, until its place is taken by the new play adapted from Sir Walter Scott’s “Woodstock.” Meanwhile “The Trumpet Call” has had great attractions for holiday-makers. Mr. Leonard Boyne as the gallant hero, Miss Evelyn Millard as the tender and devoted wife, and Mrs. Patrick Campbell as the adventuress who causes so much grief to the faithful hero and heroine, play their best, and other members of the company delight the audience, especially Mr. Lionel Rignold and Miss Clara Jecks. The forthcoming play promises to be a genuine “Adelphi Drama.”
___
The Stage (19 May, 1892 - p.8)
MANCHESTER.
ROYAL (Lessee and Manager, Mr. Thos. Ramsey; Acting-Manager, Mr. J. H. Core.)—The Trumpet Call by G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan was presented here on Monday night. Mr. Harrington Reynolds plays the part of Cuthbert Cuthbertson with manliness and vigor. Mr. A. C. Percy invests the character of Sergeant-Major Milligan with a large fund of humour. Professor Ginnifer is played by that old Manchester favourite, Mr. Joe Bracewell, who makes the most of the oddities of the character. Mr. H. W. Hatchman gives a clever representation of Tom Dutton. As the tearful heroine Constance, Miss Minnie Turner makes the most of her opportunities and does justice to the part. The Lavinia Ginnifer of Miss Ada Rogers and the Bertha of Miss Mary Raby are also good performances. The scenery and mechanical changes are elaborate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Programme for The Trumpet Call at the Britannia Theatre, Hoxton, September, 1893.]
The Stage (29 March, 1894 - p.13)
LONDON SUBURBAN THEATRES.
THE PARKHURST.
George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan’s successful drama, The Trumpet Call, is the Easter attraction here, and will be played until the end of next week. It is interpreted by a company of artists who are well up in their work, and give full significance to the play. For special commendation we may single out Mr. W. Lugg, whose performance as Sergeant- Major Milligan is extremely praiseworthy; also in terms of highest praise must we speak of the James Redruth of Mr. A. G. Leigh, whose impersonation was most finished. Mr. W. R. Sutherland did well as Cuthbert Cuthbertson; and the comedy of Tom Dutton was ably displayed by Mr. E. J. Malyon. Mr. C. F. Collings was admirably suited as Richard Featherstone, playing naturally and with quiet force. Of the ladies all are deserving of praise. Miss Essex Dane, in the rôle of the heroine Constance, looked and acted as well as could be desired. The Bertha of Miss Leah Marlborough was a good bit of acting; her work in the Doss House scene being indeed excellent. Mrs. B. M. de Solla made all that was possible of the part of Mrs. Wicklow. Little Maudie Hastings played prettily and cleverly as Little Cuthbert. Miss Howe Carewe as Lavinia Ginnifer assisted materially the success of the performance, and the remaining characters were well cared for. The play was excellently mounted, the Barrack Yard and Drill Ground and Interior of the Chapel Royal being particularly deserving of notice.
___
The Guardian (4 December, 1894 - p.7)
ST. JAMES’S THEATRE.
THE TRUMPET CALL.
The literary flavour which one expects in a drama by Mr. Robert Buchanan and Mr. G. R. Sims is not very noticeable in the present case. But literary flavour is not an indispensable element in an Adelphi drama. In all ordinary essentials the piece is complete enough, and last night proved a great success with a large audience. The hero becomes a soldier, and the scenes at Woolwich barracks are perhaps the most popular in the piece. Seldom on the stage have we seen better drilled soldiers. The hero (Mr. Charles East) and his sergeant (Mr. J. K. Walton) are models in this respect. An important part in the drama is taken by Mr. Joe Bracewell, an old Manchester comedian of good repute. But Professor Ginnifer, though a humorous character, does not quite suit Mr. Bracewell’s vein.
___
From The Strand Magazine (September, 1895 - Vol. 10, No.57, pp.260-266)
[An ‘Illustrated Interview’ with Mrs. Patrick Campbell (available at the Internet Archive) contains the following passage about her involvement in the Adelphi dramas of Sims and Buchanan.]
The Hon. Mrs. Percy Wyndham, who had seen Mrs. Patrick Campbell in the pastoral plays at Wilton, encouraged her to give a matinée of “As You Like It” in London, so the Shaftesbury Theatre was rented for the occasion, and the performance given under the patronage of the Princess Christian, and a host of other representatives of rank and fashion. Mrs. Patrick Campbell looked handsomer than ever in her Grecian draperies of green and white, although many preferred her in the forest scene, in which she appeared in a tan leather jerkin, bordered with rich sable, the belt fastened by a finely cut steel buckle, the long soft boots, also tan; the rest of the dress being of emerald green velvet, with knots of rose colour. The success of this venture may be judged from the fact of her being immediately engaged by Messrs. Gatti for a new play which was about to be produced at the Adelphi, called “The Trumpet Call,” by Messrs. Sims and Buchanan, and in this she played the part of Astrea, a picturesque gipsy, strolling actress and singer, and it was a splendid test of the power and versatility of the actress. Nearly all playgoers will remember the contretemps which occurred in one scene—the “Doss House”—which was sufficient to unnerve the most experienced actress. In the scene mentioned, Mrs. Patrick Campbell had to appear almost in rags, her skirt being of some thin black material with but scanty garments underneath. Owing to the carelessness of her dresser, the skirt became unfastened and dropped below her knees before she noticed it. Those who were present are never likely to forget the dignity and calm self-possession which she displayed in so trying a moment, nor the withering scorn of the glance she directed at one or two ill-bred persons who seemed to regard this mishap as an occasion for mirth. Gathering her dress quickly round her, she made her exit, and on her return played with more than her usual power and excellence. “My next part,” continued Mrs. Campbell, “was a great contrast to Astrea; it was Elizabeth Cromwell, in ‘The White Rose,’ a sweet, pathetic Puritan character. I next played Tress Purvis in ‘The Lights of Home,’ a fisherman’s daughter; perhaps you remember it? After that came ‘Black Domino’ in which I took the part of Clarice Berton. I created those four parts, all of which were studies of widely diverse characters. I ought to have mentioned that during the run of ‘The Trumpet Call’ I had a severe attack of typhoid fever, and was compelled to relinquish my engagement for six months, and my place was filled during my absence by Miss Claire Ivanova.” “Was it not while you were playing the part of Clarice Berton that Mr. Pinero saw you?” “Yes, the death scene in the last act, I believe, impressed him; anyhow, I got the offer of the part of the Second Mrs. Tanqueray, but to my great disappointment the Messrs. Gatti refused to release me, and it was assigned to Miss Robins; but ultimately the management agreed to let me go, and when Miss Robins heard of it she resigned this grand part without a murmur. Was it not a noble and generous act?”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Mrs. Patrick Campbell as Astrea in The Trumpet Call from the interview in The Strand Magazine.]
The Guardian (19 November, 1895 - p.7)
QUEEN’S THEATRE.
THE TRUMPET CALL.
We forget how many times “The Trumpet Call” has been seen in Manchester. One would suppose that every playgoer was familiar with it by this time, and yet last night—thanks, no doubt, largely to good acting—it held the attention of a large assemblage as if it were being performed for the first time. In this play Mr. George R. Sims and Mr. Robert Buchanan tell a painful story, and have endeavoured to lighten the gloom by a little incidental fooling. In some respects there is a wonderful family likeness between “The Trumpet Call” and “In the Ranks,” a good deal of the interest in both being due to the military scenes. The play was well performed. Mr. Cory Thomas infused the necessary robustness into the character of the hero, who, under the stress of circumstances, enlists as a private soldier and wins fame and promotion on the battlefield; Mr. Arthur C. Percy was a capital specimen of an Irish sergeant major; while Mr. Joe Bracewell—who must feel peculiarly at home on the stage of the Queen’s Theatre—was more than usually amusing as Professor Ginnifer. Miss Daisy England deserves credit for her impersonation of the ungrateful part of Astrea, and Miss Eugenie Magnus won the sympathy of the audience by her acting as the long-suffering wife Constance.
___
The Era (3 December, 1898)
COUNTY THEATRE, KINGSTON. On Monday, Nov. 28th, the Drama, in Four Acts, by George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, entitled “THE TRUMPET CALL.”
This stirring Adelphi production has been attracting crowded houses at Kingston this week, and Mr Robert Arthur’s company, who are appearing in it, have met with a most favourable reception. Mr Cory Thomas as Cuthbert Cuthbertson makes a fine cavalry soldier, and wins many friends by his fine, manly bearing. The outcast Astrea is in the capable hands of Miss Agnes Imlay, who speaks her lines with a fierce vigour and abandon well suited to the part. The fit of delirium in the third act is admirably portrayed. Mr Graham Price undertook the part of Richard Featherstone most successfully, and Mr John Sargent is the James Redruth, who is seen to the best advantage in the scene in which he stabs his unfortunate wife. The humour of the play, a welcome relief from the many touching incidents in it, is sustained with ability by Mr M. Marler as Professor Ginnifer and Mr Ralph Roberts as Tommy Dutton. Miss Ada Binnie is a charming Lavinia, and in her interviews with “Tommy” helps to keep the audiences in a good humour. A favourable impression is also created by the acting of Miss Stuart Innes as Constance, a part that makes many demands upon the artiste, but Miss Innes is equal to the occasion, and is frequently applauded for her efforts. Others deserving of a word of commendation are little Miss Violet Keand as Cuthbertson’s child, Mr J. George Hodding as Sir William Barton, Mr Arthur Palling as the Irish sergeant-major (with a rich brogue), Mr J. Edwards as Colonel Engleheart, Mr E. Davey as Captain Sparks, and Mr E. Pearson as the doss-house keeper. The play is admirably staged.
___
The Era (19 August, 1899 - p.20)
SOUTH SHIELDS.
THEATRE ROYAL.—Lessee and Manager, Mr L. M. Snowdon; Acting-Manager, Mr Fred Coulson.—Mr Robert Arthur’s company is presenting The Trumpet Call here. Mr Hilliard Vox is an able exponent of Cuthbert Cuthbertson. Mr H. Lawrence Leyton in the part of Richard Featherstone does exceedingly well. Mr Byron Pedley as Professor Ginnifer is very humorous, and Mr Ralph Roberts as Tommy Dutton and Mr H. A. Gribben as Sergeant-Major Milligan are amusing. Miss Elsie Evelyn Hill submits an admirable portrayal of Constance, and Miss Annie Saker is weirdly effective as Astrea. Mr Fred W. Mona as Sir William Burton, Mr Alfred Beaumont as Colonel Englehart, and Mr Welton Denby as Captain Sparks are all good.
___
The Era (17 February, 1900 - p.14)
AMUSEMENTS IN BIRMINGHAM. (FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.)
. . .
GRAND THEATRE.—Proprietor and Manager, Mr J. W. Turner; Acting Manager, Mr S. Doree.—That fine specimen of an Adelphi drama, The Trumpet Call, as exploited by Mr Robert Arthur’s No. 1 company, is doing good business here this week. The company is a well balanced and well selected combination, and all work harmoniously to secure the general success of the representation. The military scenes of the drama are just now particularly acceptable, and there is a genuine ring in the enthusiasm which they nightly arouse. Miss Gladys Rees gives an excellent rendering of the difficult part of Constance, and as Astrea Miss Annie Saker does exceedingly well. Mr Hilliard Vox appears to advantage in the character of the hero Cuthbert Cuthbertson; and as the villain, Richard Featherstone, Mr Douglas Vigors creates a powerful impression; Mr A. C. Percy as James Redruth and Mr Fred W. Mona as Sir William Barton render valuable assistance, and the lighter element of comedy, interspersed with Mr Sims’s usual tact and skill, is genuinely pourtrayed by Miss Lucy Beaumont as Lavinia, Miss Marie Saker as Mrs Wicklow, Mr Byron Pedley as Professor Ginnifer, and Mr Ralph Roberts as Tommy Dutton. The smaller parts are in good hands, and the drama is capitally placed upon the stage.
___
The Stage (19 April, 1900 - p.12)
THE PRINCESS OF WALES’S, S.E.
The Trumpet Call, by George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, was presented here on Monday. It needs but a glance at the front of the house and at the stage to feel the master-hand of an experienced manager. This revival by Mr. Robert Arthur, like others in the past which he has personally undertaken, is admirably done. Mr. Arthur evidently believes in the old adage that what is worth doing is worth doing well. A good play is an attraction to the public, but they want more than that—they require good acting, too. With the company performing in The Trumpet Call this is fully realised. Mr. Frederick Annerley plays the leading part of Cuthbert Cuthbertson. He gives that touch of human feeling to the character which less experienced actors are unable to impart to their work. Miss Essex Dane sustains with much charm her part of Constance. The scene at the end of the second act in which Constance confronts the soldier she believes to be her husband is exquisitely performed, and throughout the play her work is of the greatest value. That bright and clever little actress, Miss Clara Jecks, appears as Lavinia and delights her audience with her pleasing reading of this character—the one in which she scored so great a success in the original production. Mr. Drelincourt Odlum impersonates Richard Featherstone with much tact, and, although possible he was not seen to his best advantage at the opening performance, did acceptable and useful work. Mr. Ralph Roberts plays the comedy part of Tommy Dutton and scores heavily, giving, with Miss Clara Jecks, that pleasing relief which so appropriately contrasts with the more trying and sad portions of the drama. Ginnifer, the showman, finds an admirable exponent in Mr. Joseph Rowland, who with much ability makes an excellent sketch of this worthy character. The James Redruth of Mr. W. G. Blunt is ably depicted, especially in the Doss House scene. The character part of Astrea is in the hands of Miss Lena Brophy. The power of expression which she brings to bear upon the character is most effective. Miss May Relph is well suited in the part of Mrs. Wicklow, and takes the best advantage of her opportunities. A word of praise must also be accorded Mr. Arthur Palling for his capital performance of Sergt.-Major Milligan. The smaller characters are all in able hands, especially the Flash Bob of Mr. Arthur Hall. The scenery, so important in plays of this description, is lavishly supplied. The play is placed upon the stage by Mr. Walter Summers, whilst the entire performance has enjoyed the personal supervision of Mr. Arthur.
___
The Era (21 April, 1900 - p.10)
THE BRITANNIA. On Easter Monday, April 16th, the Drama, by G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, entitled “THE TRUMPET CALL.”
An excellent representation of the Adelphi drama has been given at the Britannia this week. The interest in the revival has been intensified by the appearance of some newcomers in leading parts. The hero, Cuthbert Cuthbertson, a rôle that at the Adelphi was played by Mr Leonard Boyne, is entrusted to Mr Roy Redgrave, who has received a cordial greeting from Hoxton audiences. Possessing a considerable command of emotional resources, he sustains the part with admirable spirit and vigour. A very powerful scene is that in which Cuthbertson saves from certain death the woman who has ruined his happiness and driven him from love and home. Mr Redgrave makes a decidedly favourable impression in this and other stirring scenes in the play. Another stranger here is Miss Judith Kyrle, who plays with conspicuous success the part of Bertha, the hero’s dissolute wife. She gives a convincing portrayal of the character of the gipsy vagrant, fully realising the author’s intentions by her clever treatment of the rôle. Mr Walter Steadman finds scope for his well-tried ability in the part of Richard Featherstone, though the audience would possibly feel more interest in a thorough villain of the ordinary stage type. Mr Fred Lawrence is a very humorous representative of Professor Ginnifer, with his worldly-wise maxims, his Cockney phrases, and his undeniably shrewd ideas of men and things Ginnifer is a character worthy of Charles Dickens himself, so perfect a type is he of the Londoner of the period. Mr Lawrence does every justice to the part. Miss Louisa Peach as Constance, the distressed wife, plays the part with grace, tenderness, and deep feeling, and her fitting reward is the appreciation and approving applause of the audience. Miss Marie Brian sustains with animation and high spirits the rôle of Lavinia Ginnifer; and Miss Julia Summers gives a capital rendering of the showman’s wife. Mr Fred Dobell deserves every credit for his racy and natural embodiment of Sergeant-Major Milligan. Mr Edwin Ferguson makes good use of his opportunities in the part of James Redruth. Mr James Dunlop is well placed as Tom Dutton, and Mr J. B. Howe is seen to advantage as the dignified Colonel Engleheart. Mr Ronald Douglass (his first appearance here) has made a favourable impression in the part of Sir William Barton. Miss Florrie Kelsey ably represents Lill, and other minor characters are capably sustained. The varieties this week include the Quavers in a clever musical act, and the Matagraph.
. . .
PRINCESS OF WALES’S, KENNINGTON. On Monday, April 16th, the Melodrama, in Four Acts, by George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, entitled “THE TRUMPET CALL.”
Mr Robert Arthur is to be congratulated on his choice of The Trumpet Call for his Easter attraction here. The play, with its many exciting incidents scattered throughout a plot of absorbing interest, has drawn large audiences, and the work has been mounted in the excellent style which we always expect to find in Mr Arthur’s productions. Mr Frederick Annesley was successful in his embodiment of Cuthbert Cuthbertson, and acted well throughout. Mr Drelincourt Odlum played Richard Featherstone, and did full justice to the character. Mr Cecil Wallis made an excellent Sir William Barton, and was impressive in his scene in the first act. Mr W. G. Blunt evinced much power in his acting as James Redruth, and is to be highly complimented on his work. Mr Joseph Rowlandson was amusing in the rôle of Professor Ginnifer, and portrayed his eccentricities in a humorous manner. Miss Essex Dane played Constance, her original part, and acquitted herself in a highly creditable manner, acting convincingly throughout. Astrea was extremely well played by Miss Lena Brophy, whose impersonation was received with much applause. Lavinia was also represented by one of the original cast—Miss Clara Jecks—in her usual vivacious style, Tommy Dutton was well embodied by Mr Ralph Roberts, and the pair were provocative of much laughter. Miss May Ralph was excellent as Mrs Wicklow, and Little Emmie Barton was a creditable Little Cuthbert. Mr Fred Mona, Mr Dyce Scott, and Mr Arthur Palling gave good representations of Colonel Engleheart, Captain Sparks, and Sergeant-Major Milligan. Mr Fred Norton was efficient as the dosshouse keeper, and Mr Arthur Hall acted well as Flash Bob. Other minor parts were undertaken by Mr Thomas Silver, Mr Edward Eustace, Mr Herbert Cohen, Mr John Manley, Mr Pat Waters, Mr Alec Cecil, Miss Ellaline Ponsonby, Miss Lucy Murray, and Miss Florence Trevellyn, who all did well. The play has been produced by Mr Walter Summers, under the personal supervision of Mr Robert Arthur.
___
The Evening News (Portsmouth) (4 September, 1900 - p.2)
DRAMA AT THE PRINCE’S.
The attraction at the Prince’s Theatre, Landport, this week is the sensational Adelphi drama “The Trumpet Call.” The play, which is the work of G. R. Sims and Robert Buchanan, abounds with dramatic scenes, cleverly interspersed with some capital humour; and the acting of Mr. Robert Arthur’s company is excellent throughout. The story of the play hinges on the matrimonial troubles of Cuthbert Cuthbertson, Mr. Leonard Yorke, who has contracted a marriage with a young lady, Constance (Miss Nancy price), against his father’s wishes; and further complications are brought about by Richard Featherstone (Mr. Arthur Cornell), who wants Constance for his own. Having worked matters so that the hero is forced to leave his wife and join the Army, Featherstone endeavours to persuade Constance that her husband is dead, but the accidental meeting of the husband and wife at a regimental function frustrates his schemes. The leading characters are capably acted. Mr. Joe Bracewell, in the rôle of a showman, creates considerable amusement, while Miss Minnie Litchfield as Little Cuthbert, the son of Constance, carries out her part very prettily. The play is one of the best recently seen at the Prince’s, and should have a successful week’s run there.
___
The Sheffield Daily Telegraph (20 August, 1901 - p.5)
“THE TRUMPET CALL” AT THE THEATRE ROYAL.
Although the popular Adelphi drama, “The Trumpet Call,” has been presented in Sheffield on various occasions, it has not, until this week, visited the Theatre Royal. At this house, last night, there was a most appreciative audience. For over nine years this joint work of Messrs. George R. Sims and Robert Buchanan has held a high place in popular estimation, and there is no sign at present that its popularity is in any direction on the wane. Theatre-goers need no description of the well-written and highly-interesting drama, neither is it necessary to remind them of the strong dramatic story upon which the plot is based. It is sufficient to say that “The Trumpet Call” is being played, and a good house is secured. Mr. Robert Arthur’s company, which is responsible for the production this week, is one that is lacking in no detail. In the hands of Mr. Leonard Yorke, the character of Cuthbert Cuthbertson is most capably dealt with. As Constance, Miss Kate Froude is very telling, and she proves herself an artiste of no mean ability. Other artistes who deserve special mention are Miss Alice May (Lavinia), Mr. Albert Lloyd (Tommy Dutton), Mr. Edwin Wilde ( James Redruth), Mr. Beard Randall (Joe Tompkins), Miss Mary Hardacre (Bertha), and Miss Helen Rigby (Mrs. Wicklow). The drama is well staged, all the scenic effects being of a capital order.
___
From My Life and Some Letters by Mrs. Patrick Campbell (Beatrice Stella Cornwallis-West) (New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1922 - pp. 78-85.)
‘After the matinée of As You Like It, in which I was so valiantly helped by Mrs. Percy Wyndham, I was engaged, on the advice of Mr. Clement Scott and Mr. Ben Greet, by the Messrs. Gatti to play at the Adelphi in The Trumpet Call, by Mr. George R. Sims and Mr. Robert Buchanan. On the first night of this play, in a dark scene, my ragged black skirt fell down around my feet for I wore no petticoat. The momentary sounds of levity from the audience made me glare at them in indignation: I continued 79 my tragic scene, pulling up my skirt and holding it together, behind me, with one hand, as I went up a narrow flight of stairs along a corridor—too lost in my rôle to feel dismayed. My exit line—“Oh God, may I never wake again,” I hoped had not been spoiled.* Then there were also The Lights of Home, The White Rose, and The Black Domino by the same authors. I was very delicate, and often out of the cast, with the return of loss of voice; once I was away for six weeks. Eventually I fell ill with typhoid fever. I remember how it began. It was a Saturday; we had played two performances; during these performances I kept feeling a strange icy sensation on the top of my head, gradually creeping down my spine. I said to some of the company, “Don’t come near me, I am sure I am going to be very ill, and it may be something catching.” When I went back to my rooms after the performance, these shiverings became worse. I lay awake all night longing for the daylight. I felt, if the day did not come quickly, I would be too ill ever to get home to my children, and to my mother. When the landlady came to my room in the morning, she helped me into my clothes. I could scarcely
— * It is characteristic of a certain side of human nature that I received more than one anonymous post-card, saying the writer was sure I had arranged the dénouement to make certain of a success. —
80 stand or see. She called a hansom cab, helped me into it, and told the man to drive to “Newcote,” my uncle’s house in Dulwich. The drive seemed interminable, and my eyes shut against my will. When the hansom cab arrived at the gate, I couldn’t move my hands or body. The man got down from the box and rang the bell, and the servant and the man helped me out. My mother came into the hall with the children. I remember saying, “Mother, I am ill,” and the feeling of not being able to stoop down and kiss the children. Then dark nights followed, people sitting near my bed, shaded candles, doctors standing over me—nine days uncertainty—and then typhoid fever pronounced. I can see the frightened faces that depressed me, and made me angry. I had a desire to sing as loud as I could to keep alive; and then to listen proudly to myself as I shouted. 1 was in raging delirium for days and weeks. At last there was a long silence, and I heard a voice quite close to me say suddenly the words “She is sinking.” At the sound of those words something flared like a flame of fire through me; the thought, “I cannot die, there are the children,” filled my brain. I was told the doctor did not hesitate, he noticed a change and poured neat brandy from the bottle down my throat. They told me I struggled, fighting back to life, and I am sure this is the truth. I remember the struggle. Then I began to get better. I slept for hours and 81 hours. Gradually I noticed the worn expression in the faces of those who had nursed me. What, indeed, must my mother, and my dear uncle, and others of the family not have suffered? I was little more than a girl; my children scarcely more than babies; my husband in Africa, not able to send me money. My uncle earned under £200 a year; my mother had no income of her own; and all thought of my career seemed over. My bodily strength returned, but my nerves were never again the same: something snapped that never mended. The sweetness and the calm strong faith of youth, and the belief that I could depend upon Pat had gone forever. The months and years of parting from him, the hard work, insufficient food, insufficient rest, and the strain of my long illness had killed it all. I realised, too, the closeness of death, and the responsibility of my children tore at my heart. Four months afterwards I played The Second Mrs. Tanqueray, which play, I suppose, is the most successful modern English play of the century.
82
CHAPTER V.
IT was necessary for me to act again as soon as possible. I was still physically feeble, white and fragile—my hair only just beginning to grow again—but I could not refuse the Messrs. Gatti when they sent for me to play the role of “Clarice Berton” in The Black Domino, at a salary of £8 a week. The play was badly reviewed, the Messrs. Gatti attributing the failure in great part to me. They said my voice was weak, my gestures ineffective, and nothing I said or did “got over the footlights”: and they gave me my fortnight’s notice. This was a most tragic moment for me; money was urgently needed, my illness having cost so much, and the load of debt to doctor and chemist had to be lifted. Circumstances were fiercely against me, but it will be seen Fate lent a hand to fight for me. On a certain evening Mrs. Alexander and Mr. Graham Robertson came to the Adelphi Theatre. Mrs. Alexander knew that her husband was searching for an actress to play the part in Mr. Pinero’s new play The Second Mrs. Tanqueray. It may have been chance that sent these two to the play that night, or Mrs. Alexander may have read in the paper that I was “beautiful,” and “had a rare distinction, elegance and power”—I still thought myself scraggy 83 and plain—this I cannot say. But in spite of my “weak voice” and “feeble gestures,” personality, or my looks, or some histrionic talent I possessed, came across the footlights, and sent these two back to Mr. Alexander, with the news that an actress exactly suited to the new play of Mr. Pinero was to be seen at the Adelphi Theatre. Mr. Alexander wrote making an appointment for me to meet both him,, and Mr. Pinero, at the St. James’s Theatre. I think my resolution was strengthened by the bitterness of my disappointment at having received my notice at the Adelphi. The mixture of fearlessness and fragility, the whiteness of my face, some strange and elusive charm, owing to my Italian strain no doubt, interested my future manager. I dressed carefully—I remember only my little yellow straw bonnet trimmed with cherries and a narrow black velvet ribbon under my chin tied under my left ear, with long narrow ends accentuating the length of my neck. In those days most women hid their throats in folds of écru net in the fashion of the lovely Marchioness of Granby. My throat was always bare, or in American journalistic language “sprang visibly from between her shoulders proud to bear her lovely head.” I was tall and exceptionally slight. After a few questions as to what I had done in the way of theatrical work, Mr. Pinero read the play to me, beginning at the famous moment when 84 Paula enters after Mr. Tanqueray’s farewell dinner to his friends. The reality of the play after the melodrama I had striven with at the Adelphi, made my heart bound with joy, and no doubt I showed some intelligent and vivid appreciation, though I did not at this reading, for a moment understand what Paula’s life was. Did I ever grasp it in my interpretation: I wonder? . . . Both Mr. Pinero and Mr. Alexander seemed anxious to engage me. Full of enthusiasm I went back to the Messrs. Gatti to tell them of my good fortune, and of the wonderful new rôle offered me. I remember the worried expression on their kind faces and my sinking heart as they said, “What’s good enough for Mr. Pinero is good enough for us.” They withdrew their notice, and my contract with them bound me to continue playing my part at the Adelphi in The Black Domino. The days dragged on, the play at the Adelphi remaining a failure: at last the Messrs. Gatti definitely resolved to take it off. They sent for me again and said, “If you are still wanted at the St. James’s you can go at the end of a fortnight.” Then followed another interview with Mr. Alexander, who told me it was too late; my friend Miss Elisabeth Robins had been engaged for the rôle of “Paula Tanqueray.” But Mr. Pinero was determined to get me if 85 possible. The matter was put by them both frankly to Miss Robins, who, with the most remarkable and characteristic generosity, which is shown in the following letter, surrendered the rôle to me:—
“May 2nd, 1893. “Dear Stella, “I suppose Mr. Alexander has told you of what occurred Sunday and yesterday. I congratulate you upon your splendid fortune in having The Second Mrs. Tanqueray to play. “From what I heard read of the part, it is the kind of thing that comes along once in an actress’ lifetime, seldom oftener, and that it has come to you is my best consolation for having lost it myself. You will play it brilliantly and your loyal service in less congenial rôles will find its reward in this glorious new opportunity. There is to my mind no woman in London so enviable at this moment, dear savage, as you. “Keep well and strong. “Yours affectionately always, “E. R.”
I had met Miss Robins first at the Adelphi, where she played the leading role in The Trumpet Call with me. I delighted in her seriousness and cleverness. She was the first intellectual I had met on the stage.
_____
Next: Squire Kate (1892)
Back to the Bibliography or the Plays
|
|