ROBERT WILLIAMS BUCHANAN (1841 - 1901) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{The Ballad of Mary the Mother 1897}
103
105 AD MADONNAM.
I. If I could worship in these Shrines at all, II. Nineteen sad centuries have passed away, III. “His Mother and his Brethren stood without IV. His face was raised to Heaven, not turn’d to thee, V. Our heritage of Love! . . Life and not Death, 109 VI. And yet, alas, the ways of God are dark, VII. Gentle and loving was this Man, thy Seed, VIII. And lo! the issue! Of that loving Word 111 IX. Patient Madonna, with the heavenly eyes, 112 * * *
I. And O Madonna mine! O dear grey-hair’d
II. Thou sleepest, Dear!—and yet a little space 115
117 A CATECHISM
What is thy name? ROBERT BUCHANAN. Who Those from whose seed I grew; What did thy Father and Mother then for thee? Three things they swore: firstly, to shelter me Dost thou still think that thou art bound in right Yea, and morn and night Rehearse the articles of thy belief. I do believe in God, supreme and chief Thou saidst “If Sin could be?” If Sin be blent Who is the God of Earth and Sea and Sky, He is I; Hath He no Being, then, apart from thee? 120 None. Yet abideth through Eternity? As I abide. Yet is He Lord of Death? Yea, and if I should perish, perisheth. Is He not more than thou? He is the Whole Now, name His attributes? They have but one name,— Lov’st thou the Lord? Nay; tho’ I bow before His will and word. How doth He manifest Himself? 121 In me, Name the Commandments! Ten. Thou shalt have one What dost thou learn from these Commandments? Love Swearest thou to renounce, reject, and shun Not one; Shall not the Flesh dissolve and disappear? Never, since ’tis made Dost thou believe in Jesus Christ, God’s Son? In Him, and in my Brethren every one: How many sacraments hath God ordained None; since all sacraments in Man are blent, Dost thou not realise that, being base, Death cannot touch the Lord my God. I know Dost thou not in thine inmost heart believe, All Churches, great or small! 127
129 ANTIPHONES.
THE LOVE OF GOD. How can I love Thee, God that madeth me? [1:i] Thy works, thy wonders, thine Omnipotence? Thy mercies and thy gifts?—thy large delight I love my fellow men, I love this hound But Thee? I love not Thee!—Stoop down, come near 130 There’s never a helpless thing surrounding me, I love the maid I woo, the mother whose touch Thou Vision of my Thought! Thou Mystery I seek the gentle ones who once were near, Out of thy Darkness to this Light I came, 131 And since Thy glory fills these nights and days
CONTRA CHRISTUM. No Mediator, none! If thou art God, I look within and find my godhead there, How shouldst thou mediate for me and mine 132 If thou art but the Son, and like the rest But if thou art the Father in disguise, I search within, I find my one God still. “I had not built their glory or their gain Can the all Powerful be all Pitiful? 133 No Mediator, then! Soul of my Soul,
MY ENEMY. Like to a Leper clings this man to me, I would forget him, turning in delight My very being, blighted with his breath, 134 I scorn him as the dust beneath my feet, Yea, even more firmly than the first and best Sometimes, when fiercely struggling throat to throat, Sometimes, when God doth beckon from his skies And now I know that neither I nor he 135 Nay, then, we two must down or upward move The same? Nay then, I hold mine enemy At last I pray for him, and praying know 136 RESURRECTION. Scorner of Flesh, thou who wouldst plunge in gloom The Soul? A Flower of which this Flesh is seed? This eye of Flesh, to see and apprehend, Lo, lying with a lily in her hand, All Flesh, all Form, all that was pure and fair 137 All that was beautiful, all thine eyes and sense Nought that is beautiful can die,—no form From the unconscious to the conscious life The day God can divide this life in twain 138 NATURE. Nought is so sure as this, that Nature strives Canst thou appease her hunger? For a space, Behind her footsteps crawl Calamity, Gladsome and beautiful, divinely fair, How then escape her? Summon to thine aid 139 Fringe of her raiment, dewdrops on her feet, Dying yet deathless, changeful yet unchanged, Yet be of comfort,—let her wend her way! And thou, my Soul, art deathless, being part Destroying all things, she destroyeth nought, 140 141
143 L’ENVOI. Think not that I blaspheme Atheist thou callest me, |
|
|
While priests and poets name Him fearfully Poets and priests have lied Not thus in far off days |
|
|
Who everywhere the Soul of Pity saw— He dream’d as atheists do The Law, the Might, the Lord, Alas he could not heal It is not reverence It is not blasphemy 145 |
|
|
Seeking in vain to break the Tyrant’s rod;
[Notes: 147
149 PROSE NOTE.
THE ATHEISM OF JESUS. I. I HAVE thought myself justified, while trying to realise how Jesus of Nazareth may have struck a contemporary, in using as my dramatic mouthpiece his own Mother, the wife of Joseph the Carpenter. All the phases of my conception can be supported, if necessary, by the existing Christian documents; and if they could not be so supported, they are still justifiable, since the imagination of a modern Poet is fully as reliable as the imagination of a mediæval Monk. |
apart from God.” It seems a paradox to say so, but in this respect—ignorance of the Divine Law, assumption of powers to break it or suspend it—Jesus 150 of Nazareth was an unbeliever, perhaps the most audacious unbeliever who has ever lived. 151 II. In what he chooses to call “A Modern View of Jesus Christ,” and which he describes as a picture “in no way concerned with the disputed question of the Divinity of Jesus,” Mr. G. B. Crozier, author of a work on “Civilisation and Progress,” betrays the usual indifference to logic which seems to beset all men who trim and tinker the bewildering popular religion. His account of the moral evolution of Jesus, from the period when the Nazarene postulated a Judaic God of Justice, until the period when he postulated instead a cosmic God of Love, is framed in the familiar manner of light-hearted amateur historians and light-headed Broad-Church divines. In the discussion of any other subject, save this creed of formulas and cobwebs, a writer of Mr. Crozier’s intelligence would first marshall his facts and then frame his theories; but the invariable method of Christian theologians and historians is to frame the theories first, and then marshall the facts to support them. “For when John,” says Mr. Crozier, “sent his disciples to ask Jesus whether or not he were really the Messiah, Jesus simply (sic!) said, ‘Go and show John these things which ye hear and see,—the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the Gospel preached to them.’” “Indeed,” adds Mr. Crozier, “the more he, Jesus, pondered, the more he was convinced that the only kind of Messiah that could possibly be sent by a God of Love must be a comforter of the poor and weak, the lowly, the broken-hearted: a healer of the deaf, the lame, the blind, etc.” In other words, the only possible method by which a God of Love could reveal Himself to his creatures would be the method adopted by 152 every God of Wrath,— the breaking of His own laws, the revelation of His own caprice,—the method, in short, of popular Thaumaturgy! Thus a fairly intelligent and eclectic writer, beset by the insincerity of his hopeless subject, begins by telling us that his picture has nothing to do with the question of the Divinity of Jesus, and then accepts en bloc the signs, portents, and miracles which, if established by rational evidence, would put the quœstio vexata at rest for ever! R. B. _____
Back to The Ballad of Mary the Mother - Contents or Poetry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|