ROBERT WILLIAMS BUCHANAN (1841 - 1901) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOK REVIEWS - POETRY (2)
Undertones (1863)
The Athenæum (19 December, 1863) Undertones. By Robert Buchanan. (Moxon & Co.) As surely as a light tread and a rapid knock announce the arrival of a postman, so do a certain choice of theme, a massive lilt and sway of line, a vigorous, unworn power of illustration, announce the coming of a poet. No man who listens to the music of these ‘Undertones’ will hesitate in bestowing that high and gracious title on Mr. Robert Buchanan. A line snatched out from the text of almost any page will suggest the presence of a true pretension, and a careful enjoyment of the poem will induce readers of imagination to admit the claim. And, like a wave, I gather strength, and gathering strength, I moan, —is a poetic line, bearing on its strong crest a noble image: And gather strength, only to make a louder moan in breaking! Will any one hesitate to say that, whether he may have used his poetic gifts ill or well, the man who wrote that line has in him the gift of song? Eternities of lonely reign, How the gods and goddesses of the higher world were startled by this cry from the darker realm, we need not stay to tell. The cry was answered to the innermost spirit of the immortal fiend. Few things in modern poetry are finer than the poet’s magnificently dark and weird imagining of the Great Terror, when, in answer to his cry of pain, there came upon him, by degrees, a sense of love approaching through the voids of space:— When lo, there murmur’d on my brain, And I was ’ware that overhead Large and godlike comes the embodiment of love into the infernal regions: softening the fiery desert into a sort of beauty, and smiling into serenity and rest its dreadful king:— And in the seed-time after snow, And the sweet Bow bends mild and bland But when afar thro’ rifts of gold After the song of Ades comes the song of Pan; a low, sweet, garrulous prattle, full of tenderness, and longing, and complaint, and prophecy. Pan looks up into heaven; and sees there the godlike forms which make him ugly. Half beast of the field, half angel of the air, he groans over the fate which made him conscious of his own inferiority to the higher gods—of the god’s brain being married to the goat’s limb. He, too, cries for love, but the love he chases, scared by his foul visage, flies from his pursuit, to melt away suddenly into nature—Daphne into the pool and reeds. But out of his wail and sorrow for this lost love, comes to Pan that new power of musical speech which made him the enchanter of gods and men, so that even to him, the unhappy, love was blest. They heed me not, rude men, they heed me not; To this succeeds the noblest portion of the poem, the story of Pygmalion. Here we have another cry for love, unlawful, nay, unholy; answered to the wish and cursed in the very act of realization. The sculptor has done his task:— Blue night. I threw the lattice open wide, Whereat there swam upon me utterly But, like a snake’s moist eye, the dewy star When Shame lay heavy on me, and I hid Then follows the love-making between the mortal artist and the beautiful thing which he had made—the soulless image of his own impious soul. At last, the higher intelligence subdued the lower, when came the revel of the senses:— Then sat we, side by side. She, queenly stoled, The revel fitly ends:— Three days and nights the vision dwelt with me, No one, we think, will doubt that this is poetry, and of a noble kind. It would not be fair to draw upon a first volume of verse any further, and after our quotations it would be superfluous to say that we recommend ‘Undertones’ to our readers. [Note: This review was written by William Hepworth Dixon.] ___
Glasgow Herald (26 December, 1863) LITERATURE. UNDERTONES. By Robert Buchanan. London: Edward Moxon & Co. (Pp.241.) MR. BUCHANAN says in his preface that the class of minds to which his poems appeal will understand him, when he states that he was compelled at too early an age to get his bread by letters, and that the composition of an ambitious poetic work like the “Undertones” has, therefore, been attended with many difficulties. Had greater leizure been at his disposal, the fruit of his studies would have been mellower and riper; yet we freely accord to Mr. Buchanan “a certain victory,” which he claims, in having been able at so early an age to complete his ambitious project, and we accept his work as a triumph both for what is accomplished, and for what is indicated as being within the reach of his genius. The “Undertones,” by which we understand the mythological portion of the work, may be described as half-fanciful, half- philosophic readings of some of the old Grecian myths—an old poetic theme, which has not been much affected of late. The heathen gods have rather gone out of fashion with modern poets, and even the recognised patron of poetry—Apollo—is scarcely now once appealed to, for their reign in imaginative literature completely passed away with the new poetic vigour that succeeded the first French Revolution. And yet the old stories of the gods, of the Naiads, Dryads, and Satyrs, and of the semi-divine heroes of Greece, have a perpetual interest, especially to youthful imaginations, and will probably be capable of new interpretations to all time. Mr. Buchanan has seized these old and somewhat hackneyed subjects with remarkable boldness and originality, and reads us a fresh and noble lesson out of them. He has linked together his principal themes by a chain of thought which we understand to be the undertones; and though we should have liked that Mr. Buchanan had made his meaning plainer to the generality of readers, it is not improbable that the class of minds to which he appeals may rather themselves prefer to lift the veil with which he has thought fit to hide some of his boldest and most original conceptions. In some of the myths it is not difficult to recognise the new thought of our time peeping out from beneath the Pagan drapery. What, for instance, could better shadow forth one of the highest speculations of modern thinkers than the following lines from the myth of Proteus:— Through wondrous change on change— Nay, evermore, I grow, These lines are written by a true poet, because, with the trick of rhyme, flow of fancy, and felicitous expression, we recognise a rich thoughtfulness which only come from a poetic imagination. The undertone in “Proteus” swells up into a full round note, but in some of the poems it is not so distinct, and it is smothered altogether in others, by the luxuriance of the language. Pan forms the subject of one of Mr. Buchanan’s poems, and he has treated that most mystical and wonderful of all the Grecian fables with a fresh original power that does one good to read. Pan thus addresses the gods:— ME, when at first A Platonist might have written the foregoing, but only a modern thinker could have made Pan utter the following prophecy:— In the time to come,—in years We quote those verses rather to show the spirit in which Mr. Buchanan has conceived the “Undertones,” than to illustrate the power of his imagination, or the variegated music of his verse. We might cull numerous beautiful images and bits of word-painting from every page of the “Undertones;” but we consider it of far greater consequence for Mr. Buchanan’s reputation to show that, besides possessing full powers of expression, he has also something to express, and that a fertile, bold, and original intellect underlies, and to some extent controls, the exuberant fancy which puts forth the lush summer flowers and blossomings in his poems. His verses please the ear, with their mere verbal melody, but beneath that there is a low sublimer tone, which perhaps only some of his readers will catch, and hail with far greater pleasure than the louder but more commonplace melody of the former. In “Ades, King of Hell,” the first myth treated by Mr. Buchanan, we have the love marriage of the earth and the nether-world—life and death—sung in stanzas that no young poet of the present day has equalled. The verse chosen in this poem is difficult to manage, but in Mr. Buchanan’s hand it becomes melodious as the reeds of Pan. Here is the picture of the daughter of Cere, the bride of Ades:— Soft yellow hair, that curled and clang, The three last verses, in which Ades tells of the mild influences of his Queen on the nether-world, are so beautiful that we cannot refrain from quoting them, especially as they illustrate the power of the poet in veiling new though under old fable:— And in the seed-time, after snow, And the sweet bow bends mild and bland But, when afar thro’ rifts of gold In the Satyr Mr. Buchanan gives us, first of all, a vivid picture of that half-human half-bestial denizen of the woods and rocks as conceived by the Grecian imagination; but, superadded to this is the craving for love, and the unutterable human longing of the monster. We see in this suggestive poem the mere creature of the earth stirred into a new sensation of being, by heavenly influences, his hard face softening, and his hairy breast tenderly heaving, till it seems as if the prophecy of Pan were to be fulfilled in his case also. The following lines show the half dreaming, humanising thoughts of the Satyr:— But ere I knew aught In Polypheme’s Passion, we have a well managed dialogue between Silenus and the One-Eyed Cyclops—the subject being love as it struggles with the gross appetites of this god-born, but earthly and sensual monster. The Greeks have represented the Cyclops to us as the embodiment of merely physical strength, inhospitable to men, defiant of the gods, and one-eyed mentally as well as physically. Mr. Buchanan touches the heart of this strange being with love for the sea goddess Galatea, and forthwith that melting passion transforms the great hulking giant from a dull scowling savage into a strangely tender lover, feeling after and bemoaning his want of the graces of humanity. Silenus, we understand, with his drunken counsel, is used as a foil to the love and tenderness of Polypheme. Wine in his nostrils, Polypheme will be, Penelope is a very fine poem, from which we might quote some beautiful passages; but we pass it and several minor pieces to notice “Pygmalion the Sculptor,” which is certainly the author’s most ambitious effort. It is the most carefully handled, and shows, even more fully than any of the pieces we have yet referred to, that which we have claimed for this young poet—viz., originality of conception, and the power of conveying suggestive ideas. He catches and reflects back to his readers “the light that never was on sea and shore” with an almost unconscious effort on his part. This poem has many morals. The most obvious—the bitter end of unlawful love—will at once suggest itself to the reader; but, studied attentively, it may teach some things even higher. We have only room for a few verses. The following represents the sculptor gazing on his finished work:— When Shame lay heavy on me, and I hid With haggard eyes He woos the fair but soulless form which he has created, and for a few days revels in the pleasures of her love. But he is degraded, and almost sinks to the level of the merely sensuous creature whom he has wedded, when the plague spares him from drinking the full contents of the circe cup. Then sat we, side by side. She, queenly stoled, The other poems, composing the “Undertones,” are all written with remarkable poetic ability, and exhibit quickness of fancy, variety of thought, and a great command of poetic language; but we cannot trace their connection with the central thoughts running through those to which we have already referred. We have said enough, however, to draw the attention of the lovers of true poetry to Mr. Buchanan’s first ambitious effort. Some fault may be found with him in his choice of subjects, and in the somewhat frequent extravagance of his language; both are the results of youth, and as his imagination sobers, and his intellect gains greater experience, he will find subjects of a more homely, but not less poetic character, which he will imbue with less flashing, but more enduring colours. The faults of these poems are, in so young a man, an earnest of future excellence, for they are the faults not of dullness but of genius. Mr. Buchanan will find plenty of critics to point out and exaggerate these, and we hope he will, in the execution of future labours, attempt to avoid them. We have found so much pleasure in perusing the best portions of his book, that we do not undertake the thankless task, but conclude by heartily recommending “Undertones” to the studious attention of our readers. ___
Dorset County Chronicle and Somersetshire Gazette (21 January, 1864 - p.13) UNDERTONES.* To the reflective mind of a thoughtful man there would seem to be a large amount of scepticism in the thought that the ideal and the inideal can meet together at so many possible points of contact as they do in these high practical railroad days. In the ever-onward and cyclonic progress of Time—in the eternal and ceaseless revolutions of the great wheels of life we seem to recognize a renewal and resurrection of past ideas and thoughts, and to become the witnesses of a revelation which seems to unite the past and the present in one. It is years since we beheld a poet-peer in the House of Lords; yet in the interval that has elapsed between the death of Lord Byron and the creation of Lord Houghton, better known by his name of Monckton Milnes, what mighty and mysterious changes have swept over our minds, with regard to what poetry really is as well as with respect to the dignity and station which the poet should really assume and occupy in that body corporate denominated society. Though the age in which we live be a practical and railroad-loving one—though we find ourselves surrounded and encircled by all that is repulsive and antagonistic to poetic thought and feeling—though in the present crush and wear of thought the overtasked brain and mind have but very few spare hours left which may or can be devoted to poetry—yet in spite of all these anomalous and seemingly uncontrollable influences, poetry, and poetry too of a very refined and ideal character, flourishes and prospers in our midst. There may and possibly do exist very many causes to account for this; we do not profess to enumerate them all, but we may specify some few facts which bear upon the subject in question. men of all classes and kinds inherit and work out a greater propensity to wander in search of the picturesque and the glorious in nature and art—the shapes and sounds of loveliness developed and echoed from mountain, sea, and sky—the unparalleled and undying beauty of all those art treasures which are now so freely brought within the reach of the lowest and humblest minds—the improved and graceful idealism developed in the manufacture of our textile and moulded fabrics, and the general and gracious inheritance of higher and nobler thoughts respecting man’s mental condition and power—some of these may be among those living powers which are slowly and insensibly moulding the minds of men to a more ideal and poetic inspiration of thought. Nor would we when inquiring into this subject undervalue that ever-present principle of moral antagonism which in these days of practical working and labour keeps man back from eternally gazing upon practical results, and draws him back from material facts to look on and linger amid the regions of ideal and poetic thought. Nor is this all. The poetry which is popular and current in the present day is poetry of a peculiar and highly refined characters. It is poetry in which sentimentalism of a very exalted character is present, such as we find in the gorgeous and beautiful productions of Shelley and Keats, and such as could only be developed in highly tempered and imaginative minds. It is in this high school of poetic thought and language that Mr. Williams Buchanan has studied, and he has risen up from that study gifted with an ideal and far-seeing power of thought such as few young poets can attain to. If he has not the mellifluous softness and smoothness of versification which belong to the Poet Laureate, he has attained to a high ideal reach of thought and a power of inspired song to which few young poets in the present day can lay so gifted a claim as he. Some of the poems in this volume form a beautiful arabesque of fancies, thoughts, and images. They are starred over with the richest conceits and the most fairy-like fancies; they are clad in an embroidery of pure gold and purple, and Mr. Buchanan presents his first volume to the public as an earnest of yet better things to come. He is a true poet, with all the wealth of thought and feeling which should ever belong to one who seeks for a higher inspiration than the present prosaic railroad-life can give. He is a denizen and a dweller in fairer and more radiant worlds than this; he has gone to the grand old pagan mythology of the past world, and he has questioned the creatures and beings of Olympus, and has wrought out in pure and beautiful song the melodious voices of Pan and Semele. There is a tragic power in his poem on “Polytheme,” and a sweet undertone of song in the “Naiad,” couched in language of sweet and delicious feeling. The following extract will prove the truth of what we have said respecting the contents of this volume:— GALATEA’S EYES. “Profane them not! For their sweet fire is These lines tell us at once in what school of poetry Mr. Buchanan has studied, and to what fountains and sources of song he has gone for his inspiration. He has gained a partial insight into the mysteries of nature, and has gone down with trembling footstep into her most hidden recesses, and has thence come forth armed with strong melodies and voices of song. He has gathered up many thoughts and fancies from all those sources which are open to those who seek for inspiration in remote and distant regions of thought. He has sought in the “inapparent void” of a distant and departing mythology for moods of thoughtful and solemn song, and he has spread a spectral and phantom creation of beauty around every being whom he has invoked. If he has not reached to the high perfection of Shelley’s versification—if his verse does not record or resound to the high mellifluous beauty to be met with in the Hyperion of Keats, we yet meet with many verses in this volume whose lines stamp their writer as a true and genuine poet! * Undertones. By Williams Buchanan. Moxon and Co., London. ___
The Guardian (3 February, 1864) Undertones. By ROBERT BUCHANAN. Moxon. The days are not yet ended in which aspiring poets are seized with the desire to look the ancient gods and goddesses in the face. We hear very little of the Muses and Helicon, but a good deal of Ida, and Pan, and Hyperion, and Polyphemus. The Merman has almost superseded Neptune, and the Scandinavian Odin has overpowered the Latin Mars; still, Venus is allowed considerable license, especially if she will consent to call herself Aphrodite. On the same principle, Jove, under the name of Zeus, is permitted to rule Olympus—or Olumpos, as Mr. Buchanan spells the word in one place by way of variety; and an uglier or more disenchanting word than this form of the name, a word better calculated to choke the rebellious giants like a mass of putty, without the superimposition of Ossa and Pelion, it is not easy to imagine. We have no intention of accusing Mr. Buchanan of the want of an ear; he is generally happy in his choice of words and rhythms, and Olumpos is quite exceptional in his pages. In these days it would be idle to enter a general protest against Greek modifications of words which come to us through the Latin, and we must content ourselves with waiting till Phoibos disappears before the returning Phœbus, unless indeed both Phoibos and Phœbus are doomed to vanish before some later and more popular form of the Sun-god. It is a slip of scholarship rather than of taste, when Mr. Buchanan introduces Horace talking of Favonus instead of Favonius. Indeed, we cannot say that Mr. Buchanan’s Undertones, although devoted to such subjects as Selene the Moon, and Iris the Rainbow, and Orpheus the Musician, and Pygmalion the Sculptor, have caught the true classical key. They have neither the ancient simplicity nor the ancient brevity, and have apparently been prompted less by the study of classic writers than by Mr. Tennyson and Mr. Browning. We should not be surprised if Mr. Buchanan is sensible of this and would freely admit it, for in a short and candid Preface he informs the reader that he has been obliged, at too early an age, to get his bread by letters. Here, then, may cease a vein of criticism which is not praise, and is not meant to be censure. Under all the circumstances, it should be freely allowed that Mr. Buchanan has treated his subjects well. He has clothed the antique forms which he found ready to his hand in a rich, sensuous, many-folded, curiously plaited garment of modern hue and textures. His Polypheme has a rhythmical movement in the heights of his passion, which marks him for an educated giant; and his Pan is at least sufficiently refined to lament his want of refinement. Let us hear the plaint of that uncomely deity:— Ha! turn your mild grand eyes, O gods, and hear! Poor Pan! but every one has his trials. If Mr, Buchanan were a little more like the god in his primitive shape, before he was smoothed down in the endeavour to make him look handsome, he might be further on the road to originality than he is. It should be remembered, however, that these are only his Undertones; he may still have in him a strain of powerful and unconventional music. ___
Illustrated Times (21 May, 1864) Undertones. By ROBERT BUCHANAN. Moxon and Co. If this book has lain too long upon our table, it has been partly because we have been loth to pass from the mood of simple enjoyment into that of criticism; even of such mitigated “criticism” as that which our readers know we are in the habit of permitting to ourselves when a book of verse seems to us to overpass, upwards, the line which separates mere metre from poetry. All works of art which can really challenge serious attention transcend criticism, alike in their growth, their qualities, and their fortunes. Exposition is, of course, possible; and it is desirable, when there is space for doing it well; so, perhaps, is the minor criticism which deals with casual faults. But with regard to the latter, it may well be urged that when the first heats of composition are over a writer will find out his errors for himself, and cure them is they be curable; while, as for “faults” which are truly idiosyncratic, criticism is wasted breath. They are organic in kind, and can no more be removed than a birthmark; or, at least, not without mutilation. What could criticism have done with the “faults” of Blake? What did criticism do with the “faults” of Thackeray? What has criticism done with the “faults” of Mr. Browning? IRIS THE RAINBOW. I. ’Mid the cloud-enshrouded haze II. Then Zeus, arising, stoops III. Thence, with drooping wings bedew’d, “Pygmalion” is not so good as it might be. The colours are spilt about too much; the conception and phrase, both, too often approach melodramatic commonplace; while the little songs introduced are positively bad. The ugly Jewish word “Ichabod” is a great blunder, and is one hint out of many that the “fiery matter” in the author’s mind had not whirled itself quite into roundness and unity when he wrote. We have some suspicion that, like Shelley and Keats, he is wanting on the side of humour, though not so much as those two great immortals. But in “Polypheme’s Passion” there are indications of a mind so apprehensive in that direction that we hesitate to form any guess as to what a broadened knowledge of life may do for Mr. Buchanan. “The Voice of the Snow” strikes us as deficient; but it is hung below the line, and is almost put out by the other pictures, so perhaps we should be wrong if we were tempted to say that the poet was off his beat when he produced it. ___
The Morning Post (18 July, 1864 - p.6) |
Birmingham Daily Post (1 August, 1864) The Society for the Encouragement of the Fine Arts has awarded its silver medal to Mr. Robert Buchanan, for “Undertones.” The same author has in the press a volume of Pastorals. ___
The Standard (10 August, 1864 - p.6) Undertones. By Robert Buchanan. London: Edward Moxon and Co.—It is not easy to pass from title-page to poems in this book, and retain the critical spirit undisturbed. For between these there stands a dedication—in itself a prose-poem of touching beauty, which might well disarm the most severe reviewer. Inscribing this book to Westland Marston, Mr. Buchanan speaks of his friendship as having been a comfort to him during four years of the bitterest struggle and disappointment. “The world,” he says “knows least of your noble soul. High-minded, gracious-hearted, possessed of the true instinct of an artist, you have laid me under a debt of affection which I can never repay; yet take the book, as a token that I love and honour you.” It is pleasant to find that the critical severity which this dedication would make so much more difficult is not called for when we come to read the poems. Mr. Buchanan claims that the mere completion of his ambitious design, no matter how faulty the workmanship may be—is, under the circumstances, a triumph in itself. We give him full credit for this triumph. Under pressure of disappointment, when the poet is struggling with adverse fate, it is hard to write any poems but those which soothe his sorrows by setting them forth in words. And Robert Buchanan must have the true poetic spirit to have been able, during years of trouble, to withdraw himself from his own daily fears and anxieties into the golden atmosphere of antique myth and legend which he reveals to us in the “Undertones.” But we do not praise him merely for the completion of his task. He has given us some really good poetry. We find, indeed, as it is natural to find, a too fanciful imagination, a too lavish use of epithets, and occasional straining after effect where the writer has evidently been afraid of appearing prosaic; but these are failures of the right kind. Time will correct them, will tone down extravagances, will teach Mr. Buchanan to rely more on the power of his thought and less on the polish of his diction. Faults like these are not of evil omen. They are the gambols of the untrained Pegasus. Macaulay (and the instance is strictly in point) condemned his early essay on Milton as “overloaded with gaudy and ungraceful ornament.” An original copy of Mr. Tennyson’s early poems is now a curiosity, so carefully has he in later years corrected the productions of his youth. Keats himself, who is Mr. Buchanan’s great model, spoke of “Endymion” as “a feverish attempt, rather than a deed accomplished.” “The years wear on. Telemachus, thy son, This is gracefully written, but certainly very weak, and there is obviously a continual strain to make every thought and phrase appear poetic. The comparison to a fountain is spoiled by the line which describes the boy as “upgurgling like a fountain, jet by jet,” and the comparison of a dream to “a violet with its shadow on his cheek,” and of the “mild prophecies” of astrologers to flowers which are dewy and wet with woman’s tears, besides, are glaring examples of the strain of which we have spoken. “Mild” appears to be a favourite word with Mr. Buchanan, and it certainly is one of the first which would occur to his critics. The beginning and end of the paragraph which immediately follows our quotation show Mr. Buchanan’s two great faults. Penelope begins— “Return, Ulysses, ere too late, too late; and ends— “Thou wanderest; and with leaden arms I search If we found nothing better than this in the volume we should not have much hope for the author, but in the two poems which deal not with old myths, but with Mr. Buchanan’s own personal feelings, we find writing of a very different order. The prologue, “To David, in Heaven,” and the epilogue, “To Mary, on Earth,” are quite enough to give their author a title to the poet’s honourable name. We choose a few stanzas from the prologue. “Tho’ the world could turn from you, “And I think, as you thought, “While I sit in silence, “Noble thought produces “Lo, my Book! I hold it “But ah, that pale moon roaming ___
The Athenæum (19 August, 1865) Undertones. By Robert Buchanan. Second Edition, enlarged and revised. (Strahan.) As a rule, we have no other duty in respect of new editions of books than to announce their appearance, and hand them over to the purchasers on whose demand they have been published. An exceptional case arises when the new edition contains new work, and the new work happens to have a value of its own. In ‘Undertones’ we have such an instance. Not only have little touches of warmth and colour been laid on the canvas in many places, perfecting the verse rather than changing it, as added days of sun may ripen the peach and grape even after they are pronounced passing good; but one noble and beautiful poem has been added to the ‘Undertones.’ EUMOLPUS. Is it the voice of mine own Soul I hear? THE SIREN. I sang thee hither in thy bark to land EUMOLPUS. Thy kisses trance me to a vision wan THE SIREN. Ah, weep not, Dearest! lean upon my breast, EUMOLPUS. O voice that lured me on, I know thee now! THE SIREN. Name thy love, and I am she, EUMOLPUS. Thou art the gentle witch that men call Death! THE SIREN. Lie very softly, Sweet, and let thy breath EUMOLPUS. Diviner far than song divine can tell! THE SIREN. Charmëd sight and charmëd sound EUMOLPUS. Farewell! farewell! farewell! THE SIREN. O melancholy waters, softly flow! Shall we attempt to moralize the tale? In such a story imagination is put to some of its highest uses, and the tale has its own morals. It is a rare expression of the poet’s wealth that a poem so full of genius should have been flung all but unnoticed into a new edition. [Note: This review, like the one of the first edition in The Athenæum, was written by William Hepworth Dixon.] ___
Lloyd’s Weekly Newspaper (3 September, 1865) LITERATURE. UNDERTONES. We recently directed the attention of our readers to the poems of Mr. Robert Buchanan, when we found them the subject of sound analytical criticism in the Fortnightly Review. Mr. Buchanan has now issued a new edition of his poetic utterances. Into some of these he has breathed a new ardour. Where he has retouched he has embellished. Moreover, he has made some additions to his already noble collection. One, indeed, is not unlikely to last as the finest expression of his genius. It is called “The Syren.” The spirit is an etherial creature, who draws the bewitched man of earth, Eumolpus, through bright and happy visions of the bliss that is to be—to death and peace. “Where is my country, and that vision olden?” Eumolpus asks, minding him of the little Sicilian fishing-town where he was born. The Siren answers:— I sang thee hither in thy bark to land EUMOLPUS. Thy kisses trance me to a vision wan THE SIREN. Ah, weep not, Dearest! lean upon my breast, EUMOLPUS. O voice that lured me on, I know thee now! THE SIREN. Name thy love, and I am she, EUMOLPUS. Thou art the gentle witch that men call Death! THE SIREN. Lie very softly, Sweet, and let thy breath There is, in this, imagination of the highest order. Mr. Robert Buchanan has his place of honour in the great band of British poets. Back to Reviews, Bibliography, Poetry or Undertones _____
Book Reviews - Poetry continued Idyls and Legends of Inverburn (1865)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|